Announcements19 Feb 2008 12:14 am

I can’t sugar-coat it. This song is definitely a victim of the tight timeline. It’s a classic example of a song that just wasn’t working, not matter what I tried to do lyrically, melodically, chordally, arrangement-wise. It was so tempting to pursue the idea, because I felt there was SOMETHING there, but I just needed the time to rewrite it a couple of times to find the little nugget I was searching for. But lo, Monday rolls around and the clock looms large!

Anyway, let the group speak. Lay it on me!



Click to Play Action
View Lyrics - Rate this Song

10 Responses to “Week 7 - Comments”

  1. on 20 Feb 2008 at 6:03 pm Migs

    I don’t know about this one. It’s too easy to stop listening to what you are saying. Does that make sense? I guess what I’m saying is that you really have to LISTEN to hear the words cause the music doesn’t carry the lyrics easily. That’s my two cents.

  2. on 20 Feb 2008 at 9:07 pm Randy

    I asked Claudie to sit and listen to this one with me. As a test, before I started the song I asked her to describe the first word or two that came to her mind while the song played. I would do the same.

    Not long into the song she said she felt her word was “soundtrack” as in something she would like to be floating in the back of a romance movie. She wouldn’t really be focusing on the song but she would be soothed by your voice and melody.

    My insta-flash words on the other hand were “fast forward”. I had the urge to push the skip button on a CD player to see what the next song sounds like. (ouch! sorry about that - but that’s the feeling that came over me).

    You have such a great voice and you’re obviously extremely gifted musically on a multitude of instruments (and I’m not even counting the production side of the business).

    I guess I’m just waiting for your signature sound. I’ll know it when I hear it. I’m sure you’re it will show itself if yo keep this aggressive writing flowing. You’ll probably hit a brick wall and just when you’re most frustrated, Wham! - there it will be.

    Cheers, Randy

  3. on 20 Feb 2008 at 11:11 pm Tamsin

    I was reading the lyrics as I listened, but if I hadn’t been, I’m not sure the words would have registered; it might have been just good background noise.
    I liked the chorus but otherwise it’s not your strongest. But you knew that already!

  4. on 21 Feb 2008 at 11:05 am Robin

    Lots more homework on this one and it’s “a beauty.” Love is a wild ride
    heightened by wistfulness and uncertainty which you convey. Great vehicle for the smitten or the about-to-be.
    (Anybody songwriter who can handle the word “reality” so well and get away with it a special cat.)
    This has got HOOG PERTENSHUL. Thumb high, Yo.

  5. on 21 Feb 2008 at 10:19 pm General

    Eliot
    This song seems to me a song for the sake of making a song. It doesn’t move me, it misses some authenticity and for lack of a better word - heart. A pure deadline deal - I know the feeling. It sounds forced and rushed. It might be good for a soundtrack - the type with some cheesy CASIO keyboard parts - you know what I’m talkin’ ’bout? It left me feeling empty and wanting to get back to reality!

  6. on 23 Feb 2008 at 8:49 am Warren Porter

    I listened to it with the boys and they both gave it a three. The chorus was my favorite part but I was so-so on the rest. The score was a 3.5 but I put it in as a 4 cause I’m a nice guy.

    Cheers, Warren, Liam and Nicklaus

  7. on 24 Feb 2008 at 8:57 pm Dale

    From my point of view, the chorus isn’t workin’.

  8. on 24 Feb 2008 at 9:02 pm Dale

    I should add that I kinda liked the verses.

  9. on 26 Feb 2008 at 6:11 pm Paul

    I agree with the Casio keyboard comment man. I couldn’t figure out what I didn’t like but I’m pretty sure change that up and you are on to something.

  10. on 05 Mar 2008 at 4:47 pm eliot

    I think I just placed where and when this song’s inspiration came from. How about St. Elmo’s Fire Soundtrack, circa 1988?

    That might be my deep-seeded lifetime crush on Andie McDowell rearing its head again…

Trackback this Post |